Female Body in Symbolic Language of Myth

A twentieth snow feminist writer and a philosopher, Rosi Baridotti in her prominent book, planetary Subjects said that Women as a sign of deflection is chimerical. It is kindle to note here that more or less of the discourses and contemporary feminist theories are build around such(prenominal) a statement, which often deals with the survey of womens fat flesh, and positions it as the source of womens power, risk of infection and weakness. Jane M Ussher in his seminal work, Managing the Monstrous maidenlike says, Central to this positioning of the womanish body as monstrous or beneficent is ambivalence associated with the power and danger perceive to be inherent in womans fecund flesh, her seeping, leaking, bleeding womb stand as site of defilement and source of dread.(1)\nIn the synopsis of the above statement do by Baridotti, it can be said without hesitation that the distinction that she is talking about is the anatomic difference of the male and the young-beari ng(prenominal) bodies. Hence, it will be soft easy for us to say that the perception of the phallocentric system of a pistillate body is created on the grounds of difference, where the process of othering takes place. Further, to sybaritic on such difference we can also touch to Freudian and Cixousian understanding and go on to say that ogre of the feminine body lies in the difference that comes with its ability to weaken the phallus. Thus, it can be think here that monstrous feminine is a product of expurgation anxiety and no distrust this argument is aptly correct, provided indoors the greater affair of this article, which is to unravel the purpose of the unreal texts in portraying feminine characters as monstrous, it can be a bit knotty one, because not all women characters within a myth is correspond as monstrous physically. there are two incompatible kinds of female bodies that are acquaint in a fab text. One type of female bodies found in the mythological texts are represented wit...